Several librarians expressed concern that this book was not
appropriate for the middle school audience it was selected for, given the
description. So, I had to read it. Based on the comments of those who had read
it, I didn’t expect much. For the first
2/3 of the book, however, I was pleasantly surprised. The writing was decent, albeit a typo here
and there (a “thought” that should have been “though”) and the typical
inconsistencies one finds in YA lit these days (in timeline and clothing description from paragraph to paragraph).
I wasn’t wild about the San Francisco descriptions which were clearly
second-hand (Marin County is not considered “part”
of SF proper and describing the area as “warm and sunny” is more of an LA thing
than an “inside the bay area” thing) but I was okay with it as a
“preconception” of the character. The
storyline was a bit clichéd and predictable ... nothing horrendous for the
Romance genre. Girl from impoverished
inner-city Detroit moves to glorious California to become an au pair for a rich couple living
near San Francisco . Of course, there is a suntanned blonde boy
next door who works as a paramedic one day a week (with a huge, cute dog). The boy is attractive but
somewhat irritating – yeah, I knew where it was going. Or so I thought. A little past half-way, some darker and
confusing notes were threaded into the narrative.
There was the over-used and unnecessary plotline thrown in of
evil drunken step-dad coming into Annie’s bedroom at night (back in Detroit ). It seemed contrived and only proved to
be an additive needed to make the twisty last part of the book work. It was also in stark contrast to the first
half of the book, where Annie says that her home bedroom door “could not be closed
because the room was so small that the dresser stuck out past the door’s
threshold.” The issue of closed doors
becomes paramount in her new home. Annie says she stopped evil step-dad
by installing a deadbolt on the door … despite the fact that it didn’t close
??? This book had initial potential but
didn’t fulfill it. There were early
themes of misery and how one assumes the “other half” is better off, even when
they aren’t, but those were left in the dust as the plot began a migration to
places unknown. The two
dimensional characters never fully stepped out to any layers – in particular,
Annie. One librarian complained that
Annie didn’t sound like an 18 year-old.
I disagree – it’s just that the author never missed an opportunity to
put 75 cent words in her mouth. This makes
sense if Annie is the nerdy bookworm she claims to be but her naivety and innocence is a
little hard to take given her supposedly rough upbringing.
Maybe if she had come from a rural setting? I’m also not sure there are too many 18
year-olds out there who would consider a 20 year-old to be an “older man.” Bottom line – Annie is just a neurotic wuss
– and designed that way so that this specific story could be told. Let’s just say “Bella, move over” cuz we got
a new victimized girl for ya. These
elements combined for a “flight of fantasy” in the last third of the book. Annie is gaslighted, ending up in very dire circumstances, with murder and
madness combining in a weird, yet strangely unsurprising way. I’m not sure how a story can go completely
off-kilter yet be utterly predictable at the same time but somehow this
tale manages. The ending has a
“wrapping up the loose ties” section that results in resignation and creepiness
that may not have been intended. Let’s
just say I’m not sure our heroine ever gets a backbone. As a sidelight to the strange undertones, I
couldn’t help but feel there was some bizarre lesbian thing going on … don’t
think that was intended, either, but a little frustrated that the “big bad”
here is portrayed as a subtle sexual predator.
Oh well. Not a winner, in my
mind. We’ll see what my teen readers
think. With no outright violence,
virtually no “language” and mild insinuations, at best, about sex, I’m not
worried about it. One last note? Check out this cover in comparison to Malinda
Lo’s “Adaptation” books: http://www.amazon.com/Adaptation-Malinda-Lo/dp/B00EBFGUKY/ref=sr_1_6?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1386784871&sr=1-6&keywords=malinda+lo
Not an exact copy, but certainly evokes a very similar feel. I’m just saying.
After many years of running this bookblog my life has shifted a bit. I will continue to review books I am reading but will be adding in TV and movie reviews as well. Enjoy! Check out my companion blog: http://dcvegeats.blogspot.com/
Wednesday, December 11, 2013
“Mountains Beyond Mountains: The Quest of Dr. Paul Farmer, A Man Who Would Cure the World” by Tracy Kidder, Adapted for Young People by Michael French
In a quest to include more nonfiction on our “TAB Bookclub”cart, this new adaptation of Tracy Kidder’s powerful work was included. Not sure it will draw in many readers but I will definately be marketing it. Paul Farmer is a man we
should all know about. Surprisingly, we do
not. A doctor dedicated to the poor and
to improving the lives of those in places like Haiti , Farmer has basically
reinvented how the world deals with the health needs of the indigent and he has
transformed TB care around the globe.
The book begins with an introduction by Kidder, explaining that we
should not feel guilty when reading about the work of Paul Farmer. It is hard not to. “Tirelessly fighting for those with no voice”
is an understatement and I was left with a desire to turn over all my worldly
goods to Farmer’s PIH consortium after reading this (but didn't). It was curious to read it near the holidays, with so
many needy causes vying for attention. The book ends with a postscript which addresses the changes in PIH and Haiti over the last ten years.
The book itself seems to have undergone little or no vocabulary changes as a result of the “adaptation.” I can only assume that some of the more detailed descriptions of violence inHaiti were left out. It is a mature read and a technical one, as
Farmer’s theories of social inequity being inexorably tied to health issues are
explored as well as the epidemiology of disease in places like Haiti ’s plateau
region. It is not a page turner, and,
IMHO, not the most literary of books (a surprise, given Kidder’s Pulitzer
Prize) but a personal story and an engaging one. It is a biography, in the strictest sense,
but not a “typical” biography in any way (yes, I know … librarian filing
dilemma). Kidder has a very intimate
take on his subject, having spent nearly a year with Dr. Farmer. He gushes on about how Farmer impacts him
personally and interviews many of those surrounding the man to get a full
picture of who he is. The result is
complex and interesting. While reading it, I spent a lot
of time wondering how someone becomes as selfless and dedicated as Farmer
(so did Kidder) and thinking about the “big picture” of world poverty and
health. It becomes clear that Farmer is
not perfect, but passionate and driven.
And there is a price he pays, I believe, that is more inferred than
stated. You will have to decide for
yourself. Bottom line – this isn’t just
a book you should read, it’s one you will enjoy. Now, it's time for me to hit the internet and make a few donations.
The book itself seems to have undergone little or no vocabulary changes as a result of the “adaptation.” I can only assume that some of the more detailed descriptions of violence in
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)